Project Economics

Levelized Cost of Electricity (Natural Gas)

How the $/MWh cost of gas-fired generation is built up from capital recovery, fuel, O&M and carbon — and how to translate a power project into the gas demand it places on midstream infrastructure.

NGCC heat rate

6,100–6,900 Btu/kWh

Modern combined cycle, HHV basis — roughly 50–56% thermal efficiency.

Fuel share of LCOE

40–60%

For baseload combined cycle, delivered gas price is the dominant term.

Gas burn

~15 MMscf/d per 100 MW

Combined cycle at full load. The annual average is lower by the capacity factor.

Use this guide when you need to:

  • Compare gas-fired options on a $/MWh basis.
  • Understand what drives a project's cost of power.
  • Size the gas supply a new power load will require.

1. What LCOE Is

The levelized cost of electricity is the constant price per megawatt-hour that, over the whole life of a plant, exactly recovers every cost at the assumed discount rate. It collapses a project with a large up-front capital spend and decades of variable fuel and maintenance cost into one comparable number.

Formally it is the ratio of discounted lifetime cost to discounted lifetime output:

LCOE = Σ[ (Ct + Ot + Ft) / (1+r)t ] / Σ[ Et / (1+r)t ] Where: C = capital expenditure in year t O = operating and maintenance cost in year t F = fuel (and carbon) cost in year t E = net electricity generated in year t r = discount rate (weighted average cost of capital)

In practice, when output and costs are roughly constant year to year, this reduces to the annualized form used by EIA, NREL and IEA/NEA, and by the calculator: annualize the capital, then divide everything by annual generation.

What it is for: LCOE is a screening and comparison metric. It answers "what does a MWh from this plant cost to produce?" — not "what will this plant earn?" Revenue depends on dispatch, capacity markets and scarcity pricing, none of which appear in LCOE.

2. Capital Recovery Factor

Capital is spent once, but recovered over decades, and money has a time cost. The capital recovery factor converts a lump-sum capital cost into the equivalent constant annual payment — mathematically identical to a mortgage payment:

CRF = r(1+r)n / [ (1+r)n − 1 ] Where: r = discount rate / WACC (decimal) n = economic life (years)

At 8% over 30 years, CRF = 0.0888. A plant costing $1,330/kW therefore carries $118.1/kW-yr of capital recovery. Note how strongly this depends on the discount rate:

Discount rateCRF (30 yr)Annual capital on $1,330/kW
5%0.0651$86.5/kW-yr
7%0.0806$107.2/kW-yr
8%0.0888$118.1/kW-yr
10%0.1061$141.1/kW-yr
12%0.1241$165.1/kW-yr
Financing assumptions move LCOE as much as engineering does. Going from 5% to 12% cost of capital nearly doubles the capital component. When comparing published LCOE figures, always check the discount rate and life before concluding one technology beats another.

3. The Full Build-Up

Every term is reduced to dollars per MWh of net generation. A 1 kW plant at capacity factor CF generates 8,760 × CF kWh per year, so annual per-kW costs are divided by that output:

LCOE = (CapEx × CRF + FOM) × 1000 / (8760 × CF) capital + fixed O&M + VOM variable O&M + HR × Pgas / 1000 fuel + HR × EF × Pcarbon / 106 carbon CapEx $/kW FOM $/kW-yr VOM $/MWh HR Btu/kWh HHV Pgas $/MMBtu EF kg CO₂/MMBtu CF fraction Pcarbon $/tonne

Where the unit factors come from

These constants are not arbitrary — each is a unit conversion:

  • 1000 / (8760 × CF) — one kW at capacity factor CF produces 8,760 × CF kWh/yr, or 8.76 × CF MWh/yr. Dividing $/kW-yr by that gives $/MWh.
  • HR / 1000 — heat rate in Btu/kWh times 1,000 kWh/MWh, divided by 106 Btu/MMBtu, gives MMBtu per MWh.
  • EF / 106 — converts kg CO₂/MMBtu through MMBtu/MWh to tonnes CO₂/MWh.

Thermal efficiency

Heat rate and efficiency are the same statement inverted. One kWh is exactly 3,412.14 Btu, so:

ηHHV = 3412.14 / HR Example: 6,431 Btu/kWh → 3412.14 / 6431 = 53.1% HHV
HHV vs LHV. North American practice quotes heat rate on a higher heating value basis, consistent with how pipeline gas is sold (Btu/scf, HHV). European practice commonly uses LHV, which makes the same machine look about 11% more efficient. Mixing the two is one of the most common errors in comparing plants.

4. Why Capacity Factor Dominates

Capital recovery and fixed O&M are fixed dollars per year. They do not care how much the plant runs. Divide them by a small number of MWh and the per-unit cost explodes. This single effect explains most of the spread between published LCOE figures.

Taking the same $1,330/kW combined-cycle reference plant at 8% and 30 years, varying only capacity factor:

Capacity factorCapital + fixed O&MFuel + variableLCOE
10%$153.0/MWh$25.4/MWh$178.4/MWh
20%$76.5/MWh$25.4/MWh$101.9/MWh
40%$38.2/MWh$25.4/MWh$63.6/MWh
60%$25.5/MWh$25.4/MWh$50.9/MWh
85%$18.0/MWh$25.4/MWh$43.4/MWh

The fuel term is flat because it is charged per MWh produced. Everything else is leverage on utilization.

Consequence for peakers: a simple-cycle plant running 10% of the year will always show a poor LCOE. That does not make it a bad investment — peakers earn through capacity payments and scarcity pricing during a few hundred critical hours. Judging a peaker on LCOE alone is a category error.

5. From MW to MMscf/d

Power projects are announced in megawatts. The midstream consequence is volume, and the conversion runs through heat rate:

Annual generation = MW × 8760 × CF MWh/yr Annual fuel = generation × HR / 1000 MMBtu/yr Daily fuel = annual fuel / 365 MMBtu/d Gas volume = daily fuel / HHVgas MMscf/d (1 MMscf = 106 scf × HHV Btu/scf, so at 1,026 Btu/scf one MMscf carries 1,026 MMBtu)

Worked through for a 418 MW combined cycle at 6,431 Btu/kWh and 60% capacity factor:

Generation = 418 × 8760 × 0.60 = 2,197,008 MWh/yr Fuel = 2,197,008 × 6.431 = 14,128,958 MMBtu/yr Daily = 14,128,958 / 365 = 38,709 MMBtu/d Volume = 38,709 / 1,026 = 37.7 MMscf/d (13.8 Bcf/yr) annual average Maximum day (full load — the transport-sizing basis): Peak fuel = 418 × 24 × 6.431 = 64,517 MMBtu/d Peak vol = 64,517 / 1,026 = 62.9 MMscf/d

As a planning rule of thumb, a combined-cycle plant at full load consumes roughly 14–16 MMscf/d per 100 MW (15.0 at 6,431 Btu/kWh). The annual-average rate is lower by the capacity factor — about 9 MMscf/d per 100 MW at 60% — so the two must never be interchanged. A less efficient simple-cycle unit consumes proportionally more per MWh but usually runs far fewer hours.

Average day vs maximum day. The calculation above gives the annual-average day. Firm transport, laterals and processing are sized on the maximum day — the full-load burn, here 62.9 MMscf/d, or 1.67× the 37.7 average at 60% capacity factor. Contracting firm capacity on the average would under-size by about 40%.

Large new electrical loads are specified in MW, but delivering them requires gas supply, processing and pipeline capacity in MMscf/d. This conversion is the bridge between a generation project and the midstream system that feeds it.

6. Worked Example

A combined-cycle plant serving a steady industrial load, using the EIA AEO 2023 single-shaft reference plant.

Given: Net capacity 418 MW (EIA reference plant size) Capacity factor 60% Overnight capital $1,330/kW (EIA AEO 2023, 2022$) Discount rate (WACC) 8% Economic life 30 years Net heat rate (HHV) 6,431 Btu/kWh Delivered gas price $3.50/MMBtu Fixed O&M $15.87/kW-yr Variable O&M $2.87/MWh Carbon price $0/tonne CO₂ emission factor 53.06 kg/mmBtu (40 CFR 98 Table C-1) Gas heating value 1,026 Btu/scf (40 CFR 98 Table C-1)

Step 1: Capital recovery factor

CRF = 0.08(1.08)30 / [(1.08)30 − 1] = 0.08 × 10.0627 / 9.0627 = 0.08883 /yr

Step 2: Annualize capital and spread over output

Annual capital = $1,330/kW × 0.08883 = $118.14/kW-yr Output per kW = 8,760 × 0.60 / 1000 = 5.256 MWh/kW-yr Capital = 118.14 / 5.256 = $22.48/MWh Fixed O&M = 15.87 / 5.256 = $3.02/MWh

Step 3: Fuel and variable

Fuel = 6,431 × 3.50 / 1000 = $22.51/MWh Variable O&M = $2.87/MWh

Step 4: Total

LCOE = 22.48 + 3.02 + 22.51 + 2.87 = $50.88/MWh Composition: capital 44%, fuel 44%, fixed O&M 6%, variable 6% Efficiency: 3412.14 / 6431 = 53.1% HHV Gas burn: 37.7 MMscf/d avg day, 62.9 MMscf/d max day (13.8 Bcf/yr) CO₂: 0.341 tonne/MWh (749,683 t/yr)
Reading the result: capital and fuel are each about 44% of the total, so this project is equally exposed to financing terms and to delivered gas price. A one dollar move in gas price shifts LCOE by $6.43/MWh — more than 12%.

7. What LCOE Does Not Tell You

LCOE is deliberately narrow. Used outside its scope it misleads:

  • It ignores when the power is produced. A MWh at 5 pm on a summer peak is worth far more than one at 3 am. LCOE treats them identically.
  • It ignores capacity value. Dispatchable plants provide firm capacity and reserves that intermittent resources cannot, and that value appears nowhere in $/MWh.
  • It excludes system costs. Transmission, interconnection, backup and curtailment are outside the plant boundary.
  • It is highly sensitive to assumptions. Discount rate, capacity factor and fuel price each move the answer by tens of percent, so comparisons are only valid on a common basis.
  • It assumes level output and costs. Real degradation, major overhauls and escalating O&M require a full discounted cash-flow model.
Use it for screening. For an investment decision, move to a full cash-flow model with dispatch modelling, capacity revenue, tax treatment and financing structure — the tools under Project Economics on this site cover NPV, IRR and payback for that purpose.

References

  • U.S. EIA — Cost and Performance Characteristics of New Generating Technologies, Annual Energy Outlook 2023 (March 2023), Table 1. Source of every plant-type preset: total overnight cost (2022$/kW), fixed and variable O&M, and HHV heat rate.
  • NREL — Annual Technology Baseline: The 2024 Electricity Update. The ATB's fossil cost and performance derive from NETL/FECM sources rather than EIA; only the rate of cost improvement is taken from AEO2023. ATB also applies a fixed charge rate (FCR = CRF × financial factors) rather than a plain CRF, which raises the capital term by roughly 9%.
  • IEA / NEA — Projected Costs of Generating Electricity, levelized cost methodology.
  • EPA 40 CFR 98 Subpart C, Table C-1 — Default CO2 Emission Factors and High Heat Values. Natural gas (weighted U.S. average): 53.06 kg CO2/mmBtu and 1.026×10−3 mmBtu/scf (1,026 Btu/scf). Source of both the emission factor and the gas heating value used here.
  • EPA AP-42, Table 3.1-2a — Stationary Gas Turbines, CO2 110 lb/MMBtu (49.90 kg/MMBtu), Rating A, based on 99.5% carbon conversion. A turbine-specific combustion factor about 6% below the 40 CFR 98 reporting value; it does not cover reciprocating engines (AP-42 Ch. 3.2).
On the HHV basis: the EIA table does not state whether its heat rates are HHV or LHV — HHV is the U.S. convention and is assumed throughout. Convert before comparing with a European LHV figure.

On default values: the plant-type presets are taken directly from EIA AEO 2023 Table 1 (2022 dollars) and represent generic new-build plants, not any specific project. Capacity factor is not an EIA technology characteristic — it is a dispatch outcome — so those defaults are typical operating duty only. LCOE is dominated by project-specific capital cost, financing and delivered fuel price: always replace the presets with project data before drawing conclusions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does LCOE actually represent?

LCOE is the constant price per MWh that, over the plant's life, exactly recovers capital, fixed and variable O&M, fuel and carbon at the assumed discount rate. It is a screening metric for comparing generation options, not a forecast of market price.

Why is the capital recovery factor used instead of simple division?

Capital is spent once but recovered over many years, and money has a time cost. The CRF converts a lump-sum capital cost into the equivalent constant annual payment at discount rate r over n years, exactly like a mortgage payment.

What drives gas-fired LCOE the most?

For a combined-cycle plant running baseload, delivered gas price is usually the single largest term, typically 40-60% of LCOE. For peaking plants the ranking inverts: low capacity factor makes capital recovery dominant.

Should heat rate be HHV or LHV?

This guide and the calculator use HHV, the North American convention, consistent with how pipeline gas is sold (Btu/scf on an HHV basis). European practice often quotes LHV (about 11% higher for natural gas), which produces a numerically better-looking efficiency for the same machine. Never mix the two.

How do I convert a power project into gas demand?

Multiply generation by heat rate to get MMBtu, then divide by the gas heating value to get volume. A 418 MW combined-cycle plant at 6,431 Btu/kWh and 60% capacity factor burns roughly 37.7 MMscf/d on an average day (13.8 Bcf/yr), and 62.9 MMscf/d at full load - size firm transport on the maximum day.