1. Overview
A jet fire is a turbulent diffusion flame that results from the ignition of a pressurized gas release. Unlike pool fires, which are controlled by buoyancy, jet fires are momentum-dominated flames that maintain a well-defined shape determined by the release velocity and mass flow rate. Jet fires are among the most common fire scenarios at oil and gas facilities, occurring from flange leaks, pipe ruptures, valve failures, and pressure relief device discharges.
The thermal radiation from a jet fire can cause severe burns to personnel, ignition of nearby combustibles, and structural damage to equipment and piping. At close range, the flame can directly impinge on equipment, delivering heat fluxes of 150-300 kW/m^2 that can cause rapid failure of pressure vessels, piping, and structural steel. Understanding jet fire radiation is essential for facility siting, fireproofing design, and emergency response planning.
Flame Temperature
1,500-2,000°C
Significantly hotter than pool fires (900-1,200°C), producing higher local heat flux.
SEP Range
100-300 kW/m²
Surface emissive power depends on gas type, release rate, and soot formation.
Flame Shape
Conical / Cylindrical
Well-defined shape from momentum. Length proportional to mass rate^0.41.
Duration
Steady State
Persists as long as gas release continues. Can last minutes to hours.
2. Flame Length Models
Flame length is the most important geometric parameter for jet fire radiation calculations, as it determines the size of the radiating surface and thus the view factor to any receptor. Several validated correlations are available, all relating flame length to the mass release rate and gas properties.
Flame Length Data
| Release Rate (kg/s) | Flame Length (m) | Flame Length (ft) | Heat Release (MW) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | 4.8 | 16 | 5 |
| 1.0 | 18.5 | 61 | 50 |
| 5.0 | 34 | 112 | 250 |
| 10 | 48 | 157 | 500 |
| 50 | 88 | 289 | 2,500 |
| 100 | 123 | 404 | 5,000 |
3. Radiation Modeling
Thermal radiation from a jet fire is modeled using either the point source method or the solid flame method. The point source model treats the entire flame as a single radiating point and is suitable for distances greater than about five flame lengths. The solid flame model treats the flame as a geometrical shape (cylinder or frustum) with a uniform surface emissive power (SEP), and provides more accurate results at all distances.
Radiation Fraction
The radiation fraction (also called F-factor or emissivity factor) represents the proportion of total combustion energy that is emitted as thermal radiation. It is the single most significant parameter affecting radiation predictions and also the most uncertain. For methane and natural gas, the radiation fraction typically ranges from 0.15 to 0.25. Heavier hydrocarbons like propane produce more soot and have higher radiation fractions of 0.25 to 0.35. Hydrogen, which burns with minimal soot, has a radiation fraction of 0.15 to 0.20 despite its very high flame temperature.
4. Wind and Tilt Effects
Wind is one of the most important environmental factors affecting jet fire radiation at a receptor. Wind causes the flame to tilt from its release axis, which changes the geometric relationship between the flame and any receptor point. For a vertical release, wind tilts the flame toward horizontal, dramatically increasing the radiation on the downwind side while decreasing it on the upwind side.
The effect of wind on thermal radiation is complex. While tilting the flame closer to a downwind receptor increases the view factor and thus the radiation at that specific location, wind also stretches the flame, reducing the flame diameter and potentially the SEP. Additionally, wind promotes mixing of air into the flame, which can reduce soot formation and lower the radiation fraction. For conservative consequence analysis, the worst-case wind direction should be used, which is typically the direction that tilts the flame toward the receptor of interest.
Crosswind vs. Tailwind Effects
| Condition | Effect on Flame | Radiation Impact |
|---|---|---|
| No wind | Flame follows release direction | Symmetric radiation pattern |
| Light crosswind (3-10 mph) | Slight tilt, minor shape change | Modest increase on downwind side |
| Moderate crosswind (10-25 mph) | Significant tilt and elongation | Major increase downwind, decrease upwind |
| Strong crosswind (> 25 mph) | Near-horizontal flame | Maximum ground-level radiation downwind |
5. API 521 Radiation Limits
API 521 and API RP 521 provide thermal radiation limits for flare and jet fire scenarios that are widely used in the oil and gas industry for facility siting and equipment layout. These limits define the maximum permissible radiation flux at locations where personnel or equipment may be present, based on the exposure duration and the type of activity being performed.
| Radiation (kW/m²) | BTU/(hr·ft²) | Condition per API 521 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.58 | 500 | Continuous exposure, areas where people are present continuously |
| 4.73 | 1,500 | Pain threshold; exposure > 60 seconds causes burns |
| 6.31 | 2,000 | Maximum for personnel performing emergency actions with escape routes |
| 9.46 | 3,000 | Maximum for emergency operations lasting several minutes |
| 15.77 | 5,000 | Equipment with fire-resistant coatings or water spray protection |
| 31.55 | 10,000 | Peak heat flux for equipment during short-duration events |
6. Source Term Calculation
The accuracy of a jet fire radiation analysis depends critically on the source term, the mass release rate of gas through the leak or rupture. For pressurized gas systems, the release rate depends on the upstream pressure, gas properties, and the effective orifice area. If the pressure ratio across the orifice exceeds the critical ratio, the flow is choked (sonic) and the release rate depends only on upstream conditions.
7. Practical Applications
When to Use Jet Fire Modeling
- Facility siting studies and building blast/fire analysis per API RP 752 and API RP 753
- Quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for onshore and offshore facilities
- Flare system design and radiation exclusion zone determination per API 521
- Fireproofing specification for structural steel and pressure vessels
- Emergency response planning and safe approach distances
- HAZOP and LOPA studies requiring consequence severity estimation
- Pipeline routing studies near populated areas
Comparison of Fire Scenarios
| Parameter | Jet Fire | Pool Fire | BLEVE Fireball |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duration | Steady state (minutes-hours) | Steady state (minutes-hours) | Transient (5-20 seconds) |
| Flame temp | 1,500-2,000°C | 900-1,200°C | 1,200-1,500°C |
| SEP | 100-300 kW/m² | 30-150 kW/m² | 200-350 kW/m² |
| Control | Momentum dominated | Buoyancy dominated | Expansion driven |
| Shape | Cylinder/cone | Tilted cylinder | Rising sphere |
Ready to model a jet fire?
→ Launch Jet Fire Radiation Calculator