Produced Water Treating

DAF / IGF Flotation — Engineering Fundamentals

Microbubble-oil agglomeration, saturator design, air-to-oil ratio sizing, and the DAF vs IGF tradeoffs.

Design basis

API Publication 421

Oil-water separation design and operation.

Sizing target

A/O ≥ 0.02

mg air per mg oil for reliable 90%+ capture.

Droplet range

5–10 µm

Where flotation beats impractical Stokes settling.

Use this guide when you need to:

  • Choose between DAF and IGF for your service and footprint.
  • Derive the air-to-oil ratio from saturator pressure and recycle.
  • Size a flotation cell on both loading and retention time.

1. Why flotation?

Stokes settling becomes impractical for oil droplets below ~30 µm because settling velocity collapses with d². Flotation flips the problem: instead of waiting for droplets to rise, attach a microbubble that gives the droplet-bubble aggregate a 1,000× larger effective rise velocity. Cells process 5–10 µm droplets in 30 minutes that would take 10+ hours by gravity.

2. Bubble-oil capture mechanism

Three sequential physics:

  1. Bubble nucleation — DAF: gas dissolved at high P comes out of solution as ~30–70 µm bubbles when released to atmospheric. IGF: shear from an impeller or eductor entrains ~200–1,000 µm air bubbles.
  2. Bubble-droplet collision — both rise toward the surface; size-disparate populations have different rise speeds and collide stochastically. Higher A/O ratio = more bubble surface area = more collisions.
  3. Attachment + flotation — bubble adheres to droplet (van der Waals + hydrophobic surface chemistry); aggregate buoyancy is positive and rises to the surface skim layer.

3. DAF — pressure saturator

A side stream (typically 20–50% of throughput) is pumped through an air-saturator at 50–90 psig where compressed air dissolves into the water at the Henry's-law solubility. The saturated stream is then released through a needle valve into the cell at atmospheric — the dissolved air comes out of solution as fine bubbles (30–70 µm).

The pressurized recycle stream contacts the inlet at the cell entrance, so the bubbles nucleate near the oil droplets, maximizing collision rate. Saturation efficiency (f = 0.5–0.8) accounts for incomplete dissolution at the saturator residence time.

4. IGF — induced gas

An impeller or eductor pulls atmospheric gas (air or sometimes inert N₂ for sour service) into the cell, creating ~200–1,000 µm bubbles in situ. No saturator, no high-pressure pump — simpler, lower OPEX, smaller footprint. Trade-off: larger bubbles = lower surface-area-to-volume = lower capture for sub-20 µm droplets.

IGF is the standard in offshore deck-space-constrained applications; DAF in onshore SWD facilities where saturator OPEX is justified by tighter outlet spec.

5. A/O ratio derivation

The mass of air actually nucleated as bubbles (per L of treated water) is:

mair = sa · (f · Pabs − 1) · R

where sa = solubility at 1 atm (~24 mg/L at 90°F), Pabs = saturator pressure in atm absolute, R = recycle fraction. The 1.3 prefactor converts from mass of air dissolved at P down to volume of bubbles at atmospheric (gas-law expansion). Divide by inlet oil concentration So to get A/O. Target A/O ≥ 0.02 mg air / mg oil for reliable 90%+ capture.

6. Cell sizing

Two independent constraints:

  • Surface area (hydraulic loading): A = Q / loading, 1–5 gpm/ft² typical. Lower loading = bubbles have more time to rise before water exits.
  • Volume (retention time): V = Q · t, 20–40 min typical. Drives cell depth (= V/A).

Depth between 5 ft (too shallow — bubbles don't form fully) and 12 ft (too deep — float blanket collapses) is the sweet spot.

7. Polymer / coagulant

Adding 1–10 ppm of cationic polyacrylamide or polyaluminum chloride coagulates fine oil droplets into larger aggregates before the bubbles arrive. Capture jumps from ~80% to 95%+ in inlet streams with mostly sub-10 µm dispersed oil. The trade-off: polymer cost ($0.01–0.05/bbl) and float-handling load (more recovered solids).

8. References

  • API Publication 421 — Design and Operation of Oil-Water Separators.
  • Rykaart, E.M. & Haarhoff, J. (1995). "Behavior of air injection nozzles in dissolved air flotation." Water Sci. Tech. 31(3).
  • Edzwald, J.K. (1995). "Principles and applications of dissolved air flotation." Water Sci. Tech. 31(3).
  • WPCF Manual of Practice 8 — Wastewater Treatment Plant Design.
  • NACE SP0192 — Monitoring Corrosion in Oil/Gas Production.
  • Vendor lit: Siemens / Wabag, Veolia, Suez, Spec-Drainex.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why use flotation instead of gravity settling?

Below about 30 µm, Stokes settling velocity collapses with d² and becomes impractical. Flotation attaches a microbubble to each droplet, giving the aggregate a roughly 1,000× larger effective rise velocity — so a cell clears 5–10 µm droplets in about 30 minutes that would take 10+ hours by gravity.

What's the difference between DAF and IGF?

DAF dissolves air at 50–90 psig in a saturator and releases it to atmospheric, nucleating fine 30–70 µm bubbles. IGF uses an impeller or eductor to entrain coarser 200–1,000 µm bubbles with no saturator. IGF is simpler and standard offshore; DAF gives tighter outlet spec and is favored in onshore SWD facilities.

What air-to-oil ratio is needed for good capture?

Target A/O ≥ 0.02 mg air per mg oil for reliable 90%+ capture. The nucleated air mass scales with saturator pressure, the saturation efficiency f (0.5–0.8), and the recycle fraction; dividing by inlet oil concentration gives the A/O ratio.