๐Ÿ”ง

Mechanical Seal Flush Plan Selector

Recommend an API 682 seal piping plan โ€” flush, buffer, barrier or quench โ€” from the seal arrangement and service conditions

๐Ÿ”ง Mechanical Seal Flush Plan Selector
Choose the seal arrangement and service conditions. The selector recommends an API 682 (Annex G) piping plan โ€” flush, buffer, barrier or quench โ€” drawing on the standard plan functions. Plan recommendations are application guidance โ€” confirm the final plan with your seal vendor and per API 682.

Seal Arrangement

1 = single seal; 2 = containment dual (buffer < process); 3 = barrier dual (> process, no emission).
Routes to a gas plan (72 buffer gas / 74 barrier gas).
Single-seal vertical pumps favor Plan 13 / 14.

Service Conditions

Dirty โ†’ cyclone (31) / external flush (32); polymerizing โ†’ 32.
Hot service adds a cooler (21 / 23, or 41 if also dirty).

Leakage / Emissions

No-leak / hazardous service points toward a dual seal (Arrangement 2 or 3).

What This Recommends

Primary API 682 Plan:
A recommended piping plan code (e.g. Plan 11, 23, 32, 52, 53A, 72, 74) with its API 682 Annex G function.
Alternate Plans:
Related plans to weigh against the primary โ€” cooler vs cyclone, buffer vs barrier, liquid vs gas.
Guidance, not a mandate:
Plan numbers and functions are from API 682 Annex G; the service โ†’ plan mapping is application guidance โ€” confirm the final flush plan with your seal vendor and per API 682.

๐Ÿ“˜ API 682 Seal Arrangements (1 / 2 / 3)

API 682 organizes seals into three arrangements; the arrangement decides which family of flush plans applies:

Arrangement 1 โ€” single seal
  • One seal sees process fluid; flush conditions that fluid.
  • Plans 01/02/11/13/14/21/23/31/32/41 (+ Plan 62 quench, 51 / 65 / 66).
Arrangement 2 โ€” dual, unpressurized buffer
  • Outer seal runs on a buffer kept below process pressure (containment + monitoring).
  • Plans 52 / 55 (liquid), 72 (buffer gas), 75 / 76 (containment leakage).
Arrangement 3 โ€” dual, pressurized barrier
  • Barrier held above process pressure โ€” no process fluid to atmosphere.
  • Plans 53A / 53B / 53C / 54 (liquid), 74 (barrier gas).

Common Flush Plans at a Glance

  • Plan 11 โ€” discharge โ†’ orifice โ†’ seal; the default clean general-service flush.
  • Plan 13 / 14 โ€” seal โ†’ suction (13) or 11+13 combination (14); vertical pumps.
  • Plan 21 / 23 โ€” recirculation through a cooler for hot service; 23 (pumping ring) is the most efficient.
  • Plan 31 / 32 / 41 โ€” cyclone (31), external clean flush (32), or cyclone + cooler (41) for dirty / abrasive / polymerizing service.
  • Plan 52 โ€” unpressurized buffer reservoir for an Arrangement 2 dual seal.
  • Plan 53A / 53B / 53C / 54 โ€” pressurized barrier (gas / bladder / piston / circulated) for Arrangement 3.
  • Plan 62 โ€” external quench (steam / water / Nโ‚‚) on the atmospheric side of the faces.
  • Plan 72 / 74 โ€” buffer gas (72) or barrier gas (74) for dry-gas dual seals.
  • Plan 75 / 76 โ€” containment-seal leakage handling: condensing (75) or noncondensing vent (76).

Functions are per API 682 Annex G. The recommendation is engineering guidance โ€” confirm the final plan with your seal vendor.

Standards Reference

  • API 682 (4th ed.) Annex G: Mechanical seal piping plan schematics & functions
  • API 682: Pumps โ€” Shaft Sealing Systems for Centrifugal & Rotary Pumps
  • Arrangements 1 / 2 / 3: Single, dual unpressurized buffer, dual pressurized barrier
  • API 610 ยง6: Requires the seal system to comply with API 682

Plan selection is application guidance โ€” confirm with the seal vendor and per API 682.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an API mechanical seal flush plan?

An API flush plan (API 682, Annex G) is a standardized piping arrangement that conditions the fluid at a mechanical seal โ€” cooling it, cleaning it, supplying a buffer or barrier fluid, or applying a quench. Each plan has a number (Plan 11, 23, 52, 53A, and so on) so that engineers, vendors, and operators describe the same arrangement consistently on a P&ID.

What is the difference between API Plan 11, Plan 23, and Plan 32?

Plan 11 recirculates fluid from pump discharge through a flow-control orifice into the seal chamber โ€” the default for clean general service. Plan 23 uses a pumping ring to circulate seal-chamber fluid through a cooler and back, the most efficient cooling plan for hot service such as hot water or boiler feed water. Plan 32 injects a clean flush from an external source into the seal chamber, used for dirty, abrasive, or polymerizing service where the process fluid must be kept away from the faces.

When should I use API Plan 53 instead of Plan 52?

Both are dual-seal plans, but Plan 52 supplies an unpressurized buffer fluid kept below process pressure (Arrangement 2) for containment and leakage monitoring, while Plan 53 (53A/53B/53C) supplies a barrier fluid pressurized above process pressure (Arrangement 3) so that no process fluid escapes to atmosphere. Use Plan 53 for hazardous, toxic, or no-leak-to-atmosphere service; use Plan 52 where a small amount of contained, monitored leakage is acceptable.