Multiphase Flow

Taitel-Dukler Two-Phase Flow

The Taitel-Dukler correlation predicts flow patterns and pressure drop in horizontal gas-liquid pipelines. Essential for wet gas gathering systems, multiphase flowlines, and slug catcher design.

Flow Patterns

5 Regimes

Stratified, wavy, slug, annular, dispersed bubble

Liquid Holdup

HL = 0.05-0.95

Fraction of pipe occupied by liquid phase

Pressure Multiplier

2-20x

Two-phase vs. single-phase pressure drop

Use this guide when:

  • Designing horizontal wet gas pipelines
  • Sizing slug catchers for gathering systems
  • Calculating liquid inventory for pigging
  • Predicting flow instabilities

1. Overview

Two-phase flow occurs when gas and liquid flow simultaneously through a pipe. This is common in:

  • Wet gas pipelines - Natural gas with condensate or produced water
  • Oil gathering systems - Crude oil with associated gas
  • Well flowlines - Multiphase production from wellhead to separator
  • Process piping - Vapor-liquid streams in plants

The Taitel-Dukler methodology (1976) provides a mechanistic approach to predict flow patterns and calculate pressure drop in horizontal and near-horizontal pipes. It remains the industry standard for preliminary design.

Why Flow Pattern Matters

Flow Pattern Pressure Drop Operations Impact
Stratified Lowest Stable flow; corrosion risk at pipe bottom
Slug Moderate-High Pressure surges; separator upsets; vibration
Annular High Erosion risk; liquid mist carryover

Key References

Primary Sources: 1. Taitel, Y. and Dukler, A.E. (1976) "A Model for Predicting Flow Regime Transitions in Horizontal and Near Horizontal Gas-Liquid Flow" AIChE Journal, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 47-55 2. Lockhart, R.W. and Martinelli, R.C. (1949) "Proposed Correlation of Data for Isothermal Two-Phase, Two-Component Flow in Pipes" Chemical Engineering Progress, Vol. 45, pp. 39-48 3. Dukler, A.E. et al. (1964) "Frictional Pressure Drop in Two-Phase Flow" AIChE Journal, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 38-51 Industry Standard: API RP 14E - Erosional velocity limits for two-phase flow
When to use Dukler vs. Beggs-Brill: Taitel-Dukler is best for horizontal and near-horizontal pipes (|angle| < 15°). For inclined or vertical pipes, use Beggs-Brill correlation which includes angle correction factors.

2. Flow Regime Map

The Taitel-Dukler flow pattern map uses dimensionless parameters to identify flow regime based on gas and liquid velocities, fluid properties, and pipe geometry.

Taitel-Dukler horizontal two-phase flow pattern map showing log-log plot of superficial gas velocity versus superficial liquid velocity with five distinct regions labeled: stratified smooth, stratified wavy, intermittent slug-plug, annular, and dispersed bubble flow, with curved transition boundaries between regimes
Taitel-Dukler flow pattern map for horizontal two-phase flow showing regime transitions based on superficial velocities.

Flow Pattern Descriptions

Stratified Flow (Smooth and Wavy)

Liquid flows at the bottom of the pipe with gas flowing above. At low gas velocities, the interface is smooth. As gas velocity increases, waves form on the liquid surface.

Stratified two-phase flow diagram showing pipe cross-section with liquid layer at bottom and gas phase above, plus side-by-side comparison of stratified smooth flow with flat interface versus stratified wavy flow with undulating interface at higher gas velocities
Stratified flow cross-section showing liquid accumulation at pipe bottom with smooth versus wavy interface comparison.
  • Conditions: Low gas velocity (<3-5 ft/s), low liquid rate
  • Holdup: HL = 0.1-0.5 (varies with pipe diameter and flow rates)
  • Pressure drop: Lowest of all regimes

Intermittent Flow (Slug and Plug)

Liquid slugs periodically fill the entire pipe cross-section, alternating with gas pockets containing a liquid film at the bottom. This is the most problematic regime for operations.

Slug flow longitudinal cross-section showing alternating liquid slug bodies completely filling the pipe and elongated gas pockets (Taylor bubbles) above thin liquid film at pipe bottom, with dimensions labeled for slug length and gas pocket length
Slug flow pattern showing alternating liquid slugs and gas pockets with characteristic length scales.
  • Conditions: Moderate gas velocity (5-20 ft/s), moderate liquid rate
  • Holdup: HL = 0.25-0.50 (time-averaged)
  • Problems: Pressure fluctuations, separator upsets, vibration, water hammer

Annular Flow

Liquid forms a thin film on the pipe wall while gas flows in the center. Some liquid is entrained as droplets in the gas core.

  • Conditions: High gas velocity (>20-30 ft/s), low-moderate liquid
  • Holdup: HL = 0.02-0.15 (thin film)
  • Considerations: Erosion risk if droplet velocity is high

Dispersed Bubble

Gas bubbles dispersed throughout continuous liquid phase. Rare in gas pipelines; more common in liquid-dominated systems.

  • Conditions: Very high liquid velocity, low gas fraction
  • Holdup: HL = 0.7-0.98

Flow Pattern Transition Criteria

Taitel-Dukler Transition Parameters: Stratified to Wavy: Waves form when gas velocity creates interfacial shear exceeding surface tension restoring force. Transition occurs at: K = FrG × √(ρG / Δρ) > 0.5 Where: FrG = VSG / √(gD) (Gas Froude number) Δρ = ρL - ρG Wavy to Slug: Waves grow large enough to bridge the pipe. Occurs when liquid holdup allows waves to reach pipe top. Transition at: HL / D > 0.35 and K > 0.5 Slug to Annular: High gas velocity strips liquid from slugs to wall film. Transition at: K > 3.5 and λL < 0.4 Where λL = VSL / (VSL + VSG)
Practical tip: In the field, flow pattern can often be identified by noise and vibration. Stratified flow is quiet. Slug flow produces rhythmic "thumping" or pressure surges. Annular flow has steady "hissing" sound from high-velocity gas.

3. Liquid Holdup

Liquid holdup (HL) is the fraction of pipe volume occupied by liquid at any instant. It determines mixture density, liquid inventory, and is critical for slug catcher sizing.

Holdup Definition: HL = Vliquid / Vpipe No-Slip (Input) Liquid Fraction: λL = QL / (QL + QG) = VSL / Vm Where: VSL = Superficial liquid velocity = QL / A VSG = Superficial gas velocity = QG / A Vm = Mixture velocity = VSL + VSG Key Relationship: In most flow regimes: HL > λL Liquid "holds up" (accumulates) because it moves slower than gas. Ratio HLL is called the "slip ratio."

Holdup by Flow Regime

Flow Regime Typical HL Correlation Approach
Stratified Smooth 0.05-0.35 Mechanistic (momentum balance on each phase)
Stratified Wavy 0.10-0.40 Mechanistic with interfacial friction
Slug/Plug 0.20-0.55 Drift-flux model: HL = a×λLb/Frc
Annular 0.02-0.20 Film thickness correlation
Dispersed Bubble 0.70-0.98 Nearly no-slip: HL ≈ λL

Lockhart-Martinelli Parameter

The Lockhart-Martinelli parameter X relates single-phase pressure drops and is used in both holdup and pressure drop calculations.

Lockhart-Martinelli Parameter: X = √[(dP/dL)L / (dP/dL)G] Where: (dP/dL)L = Pressure drop if only liquid flowed in pipe (dP/dL)G = Pressure drop if only gas flowed in pipe Calculation: (dP/dL)L = fL × ρL × VSL² / (2D) (dP/dL)G = fG × ρG × VSG² / (2D) Where f is friction factor from Moody diagram. Typical Values: X < 0.1 → Gas-dominated (annular flow likely) X = 0.1-1 → Transitional X = 1-10 → Moderate two-phase X > 10 → Liquid-dominated (bubble flow likely)

Liquid Inventory Calculation

Total liquid volume in pipeline is needed for pigging operations and slug catcher sizing.

Pipeline Liquid Inventory: Vliquid = HL × Vpipe Vpipe = π/4 × D² × L Example: Pipeline: 8-inch diameter, 10 miles long HL = 0.30 (slug flow) Vpipe = π/4 × (8/12)² × (10 × 5280) = 18,500 ft³ Vliquid = 0.30 × 18,500 = 5,550 ft³ = 5,550 / 5.615 = 988 barrels This liquid must be handled by slug catcher during: - Pigging operations (pig pushes all liquid ahead) - Ramp-up or ramp-down transients - Terrain-induced slugging
Design margin: For slug catcher sizing, add 50-100% margin to calculated liquid inventory to account for terrain effects and transient slugging. Final design should use transient simulation (OLGA or similar).

4. Two-Phase Pressure Drop

Two-phase pressure drop is significantly higher than single-phase due to liquid-gas interaction, increased friction, and density variations.

Pressure Drop Components

Total Pressure Gradient: (dP/dL)total = (dP/dL)friction + (dP/dL)gravity + (dP/dL)acceleration 1. Friction Component: (dP/dL)f = (f × ρm × Vm²) / (2D) × Φ² Where: Φ² = Two-phase multiplier (accounts for gas-liquid interaction) ρm = Mixture density = HL×ρL + (1-HL)×ρG f = Friction factor (from mixture Reynolds number) 2. Gravity Component: (dP/dL)g = ρm × g × sin(θ) For horizontal pipe (θ = 0): This term = 0 3. Acceleration Component: (dP/dL)a = ρm × Vm × dV/dL Usually small for horizontal pipes; important for: - High gas expansion (large pressure drop) - Phase changes along pipe

Lockhart-Martinelli Two-Phase Multiplier

The two-phase multiplier Φ² accounts for the increased pressure drop due to gas-liquid interaction.

Lockhart-Martinelli Correlation (1949): ΦL² = 1 + C/X + 1/X² Where C depends on flow regime of each phase: ┌─────────────────┬─────────────────┬───────┐ │ Liquid Flow │ Gas Flow │ C │ ├─────────────────┼─────────────────┼───────┤ │ Turbulent │ Turbulent │ 20 │ │ Turbulent │ Laminar │ 12 │ │ Laminar │ Turbulent │ 10 │ │ Laminar │ Laminar │ 5 │ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┴───────┘ Turbulent: Re > 2300 Laminar: Re < 2300 Two-phase pressure drop: (dP/dL)TP = (dP/dL)L-only × ΦL² = (dP/dL)G-only × ΦG² Example: X = 0.5 (typical wet gas) C = 20 (turbulent-turbulent) ΦL² = 1 + 20/0.5 + 1/0.25 = 1 + 40 + 4 = 45 Pressure drop is 45× what liquid-only would be! Or equivalently: (1 + 20×0.5 + 0.25) = 11.25× gas-only
Lockhart-Martinelli two-phase pressure drop multiplier chart showing log-log plot of Phi-L-squared versus X parameter with correlation curve for turbulent-turbulent flow C equals 20, typical wet gas operating range shaded between X equals 0.1 and 10
Lockhart-Martinelli two-phase multiplier correlation showing pressure drop amplification factor.

Pressure Drop Comparison

Condition dP/dL (psi/mile) Relative
Gas only (no liquid) 5 1.0×
Stratified (HL=0.15) 10-15 2-3×
Slug flow (HL=0.35) 20-40 4-8×
Annular (HL=0.10) 25-50 5-10×
Design impact: Even small amounts of liquid (1-5 bbl/MMscf) can double or triple pressure drop compared to dry gas. Always check for liquid content in "wet gas" pipelines and account for two-phase effects in hydraulic design.

5. Design Applications

Erosional Velocity (API RP 14E)

Maximum allowable velocity to prevent pipe wall erosion from liquid droplet impact.

API RP 14E Erosional Velocity: Ve = C / √ρm Where: Ve = Erosional velocity (ft/s) ρm = Mixture density (lb/ft³) C = Empirical constant C Factor Guidelines: C = 100 Continuous service, corrosive, solids present C = 125 Intermittent service, clean fluids C = 150 Non-corrosive, no solids, controlled conditions C = 200 Theoretical maximum (rarely used) Example: ρm = 15 lb/ft³ (typical wet gas) C = 100 (conservative) Ve = 100 / √15 = 25.8 ft/s If Vm > 25.8 ft/s → Increase pipe diameter

Slug Catcher Sizing

Slug catchers buffer liquid surges from pipelines before separators.

Slug Catcher Volume: VSC = Vslug-max + Vsurge + Vholdup Components: Vslug-max = Maximum single slug volume Vsurge = Ramp-up liquid surge (typically 50% of inventory) Vholdup = Normal operating holdup (10-20 minutes residence) Slug Volume Estimate: Vslug = HL-slug × A × Lslug Where: HL-slug ≈ 0.5-0.7 (slug body holdup) Lslug = Slug length (can be 100-5000 ft) Rule of Thumb: For preliminary sizing: VSC = 1.5 × (Pipeline liquid inventory) Final sizing requires transient simulation.

Design Checklist

Step 1

Determine Flow Rates

Gas and liquid at operating P, T. Include maximum, minimum, and normal cases.

Step 2

Predict Flow Pattern

Use Taitel-Dukler map. Identify if slug flow is possible.

Step 3

Calculate Holdup

Determine liquid inventory for pigging and slug catcher.

Step 4

Pressure Drop

Segment pipeline. Iterate for compressibility.

Step 5

Check Erosion

Verify Vm < Ve per API RP 14E.

Step 6

Validate with Simulation

Use OLGA/PIPESIM for final design and transient analysis.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Ignoring liquid: Treating wet gas as dry gas under-predicts pressure drop by 2-10×
  • Wrong correlation: Using Dukler for vertical flow (use Beggs-Brill) or vice versa
  • Neglecting terrain: Elevation changes cause liquid accumulation and terrain slugging
  • Undersizing slug catcher: Leads to separator trips and production losses
  • No erosion check: Pipe thinning failures from exceeding erosional velocity
  • Steady-state only: Missing transient slugging during startup/shutdown
Best practice: For pipelines with liquid content >5 bbl/MMscf, always perform two-phase analysis. Use Taitel-Dukler for preliminary design, validate with commercial multiphase simulator (OLGA, PIPESIM, PIPEPHASE) for final design.