🏗️

Cooling Tower Sizing Calculator

Mechanical Draft Tower Design

Cooling Tower Sizing Calculator
Size mechanical draft cooling towers for process and utility cooling applications. Calculates water balance (evaporation, blowdown, makeup), thermal performance (KaV/L tower characteristic via Merkel/Chebyshev integration), L/G ratio, and fan horsepower. Supports induced draft (counterflow and crossflow) and forced draft configurations per CTI, ASHRAE, and API 661.

Thermal Design

MMBtu/hr
°F
°F

Ambient Conditions

°F

Design wet bulb: use 1% or 2.5% ASHRAE summer design value

ft

Tower Configuration

cells
-

Typical: 3-7. Higher = less blowdown but more scaling risk.

Understanding Cooling Tower Design

Approach Temperature:
Approach = Tcold - Twb. The minimum practical approach is ~5°F. Smaller approach requires larger, costlier towers. Typical design: 7-10°F.
Cooling Range:
Range = Thot - Tcold. The temperature drop across the tower. Range affects evaporation rate and tower size.
Water Balance:
Makeup = Evaporation + Blowdown + Drift. Evaporation is ~1% of flow per 10°F range. Blowdown depends on cycles of concentration to control dissolved solids.

Formula

Q = GPM × 500 × Range
Q = Heat duty (Btu/hr)
GPM = Water circulation rate
500 = 8.33 lb/gal × 60 min/hr
Range = Thot - Tcold (°F)
Approach = Tcold - Twb (°F)
Makeup = Evap + BD + Drift

Standards & References

  • CTI STD-201
    Cooling Tower Performance Testing
  • ASHRAE Handbook
    HVAC Systems - Cooling Towers Chapter
  • API 661
    Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers (related)
  • Merkel (1925)
    Evaporative cooling tower theory
  • CTI Toolkit
    Tower characteristic curves and design
  • GPSA Engineering Data Book
    Section 10: Cooling Systems

Engineering Notes

  • Approach: Minimum practical ~5°F; typical design 7-10°F for economy
  • Wet bulb: Use ASHRAE 1% or 2.5% design wet bulb for location
  • Cycles: 3-5 typical; higher cycles reduce blowdown but increase scaling
  • Drift: Modern eliminators reduce drift to 0.001-0.005% of flow
  • Counterflow vs Crossflow: Counterflow more efficient but taller; crossflow easier to maintain
  • Fan HP: Induced draft is more common; fans at top pull air through fill

Quick Reference — Typical Values

  • Evaporation: ~1% of GPM per 10°F range
  • Drift loss: 0.005% of circulation rate
  • L/G ratio: 0.75-1.50 (mechanical draft)
  • KaV/L: 0.5-2.5 typical range
  • Fan HP: 30-100 HP per cell typical
  • Tower approach: 5-15°F range