🏗️

Cooling Tower Sizing Calculator

Mechanical Draft Tower Design

Cooling Tower Sizing Calculator
Size mechanical draft cooling towers for process and utility cooling applications. Calculates water balance (evaporation, blowdown, makeup), thermal performance (KaV/L tower characteristic via Merkel/Chebyshev integration), L/G ratio, and fan horsepower. Supports induced draft (counterflow and crossflow) and forced draft configurations per CTI, ASHRAE, and API 661.

Thermal Design

MMBtu/hr
°F
°F

Ambient Conditions

°F

Design wet bulb: use 1% or 2.5% ASHRAE summer design value

ft

Tower Configuration

cells
-

Typical: 3-7. Higher = less blowdown but more scaling risk.

Understanding Cooling Tower Design

Approach Temperature:
Approach = Tcold - Twb. The minimum practical approach is ~5°F. Smaller approach requires larger, costlier towers. Typical design: 7-10°F.
Cooling Range:
Range = Thot - Tcold. The temperature drop across the tower. Range affects evaporation rate and tower size.
Water Balance:
Makeup = Evaporation + Blowdown + Drift. Evaporation is ~1% of flow per 10°F range. Blowdown depends on cycles of concentration to control dissolved solids.

Formula

Q = GPM × 500 × Range
Q = Heat duty (Btu/hr)
GPM = Water circulation rate
500 = 8.33 lb/gal × 60 min/hr
Range = Thot - Tcold (°F)
Approach = Tcold - Twb (°F)
Makeup = Evap + BD + Drift

Standards & References

  • CTI STD-201
    Cooling Tower Performance Testing
  • ASHRAE Handbook
    HVAC Systems - Cooling Towers Chapter
  • API 661
    Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers (related)
  • Merkel (1925)
    Evaporative cooling tower theory
  • CTI Toolkit
    Tower characteristic curves and design
  • GPSA Engineering Data Book
    Section 10: Cooling Systems

Engineering Notes

  • Approach: Minimum practical ~5°F; typical design 7-10°F for economy
  • Wet bulb: Use ASHRAE 1% or 2.5% design wet bulb for location
  • Cycles: 3-5 typical; higher cycles reduce blowdown but increase scaling
  • Drift: Modern eliminators reduce drift to 0.001-0.005% of flow
  • Counterflow vs Crossflow: Counterflow more efficient but taller; crossflow easier to maintain
  • Fan HP: Induced draft is more common; fans at top pull air through fill

Quick Reference — Typical Values

  • Evaporation: ~1% of GPM per 10°F range
  • Drift loss: 0.005% of circulation rate
  • L/G ratio: 0.75-1.50 (mechanical draft)
  • KaV/L: 0.5-2.5 typical range
  • Fan HP: 30-100 HP per cell typical
  • Tower approach: 5-15°F range

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the approach temperature in a cooling tower?

Approach temperature is the difference between the cold water temperature leaving the tower and the ambient wet bulb temperature. A typical approach is 7-10°F. Smaller approach (5-7°F) requires a larger, more expensive tower. Below 5°F approach is generally impractical and uneconomical.

How do you calculate cooling tower makeup water?

Makeup water equals evaporation loss plus blowdown plus drift loss. Evaporation is approximately 1% of circulation rate per 10°F of cooling range. Blowdown equals evaporation divided by (cycles of concentration minus 1). Drift is typically 0.005% of circulation rate for modern towers with drift eliminators.

What is the L/G ratio in cooling tower design?

L/G ratio is the liquid-to-gas mass flow ratio (lb water / lb dry air). It typically ranges from 0.75 to 1.5 for mechanical draft towers. Lower L/G means more air per unit of water, requiring larger fans but a shorter tower. Higher L/G means less air, requiring a taller tower with more fill volume.

What is KaV/L (tower characteristic)?

KaV/L is the Merkel number or tower characteristic that quantifies cooling tower thermal performance. It represents the number of transfer units (NTU) and is calculated by integrating dT/(h_s - h_a) over the cooling range using the Chebyshev 4-point numerical method. Higher KaV/L means more difficult cooling duty.