1. Process Overview and Purpose
The SCOT (Shell Claus Off-gas Treating) process is the most widely used tail gas treating technology in the sulfur recovery industry. Developed by Shell in the 1970s, it treats the tail gas from a Claus sulfur recovery unit (SRU) to achieve overall sulfur recovery efficiencies of 99.8–99.9%, far exceeding what a Claus unit alone can deliver (typically 95–97% for a two-stage unit or 97–98% for a three-stage unit).
The fundamental purpose of the SCOT process is to convert all remaining sulfur species in the Claus tail gas—including SO2, COS, CS2, and elemental sulfur vapor—back to H2S, then selectively absorb the H2S in an amine contactor. The rich amine is regenerated and the acid gas is recycled back to the Claus unit front end, creating a closed-loop system for sulfur recovery.
Four Main Process Steps
- Reducing Gas Generation: An inline burner or reducing gas generator combusts fuel gas with a substoichiometric air supply to produce a hot gas stream rich in H2 and CO. This reducing gas is mixed with the Claus tail gas before entering the reactor.
- Hydrogenation Reactor: The combined stream passes over a cobalt-molybdenum (CoMo) catalyst bed, where all sulfur species are converted to H2S through hydrogenation and hydrolysis reactions.
- Quench and Cooling: The hot reactor effluent is cooled from approximately 650°F down to 100–130°F using a waste heat boiler and/or direct contact quench tower. Water vapor condenses and is removed.
- Amine Absorption: The cooled gas enters a selective amine absorber (typically MDEA) that removes H2S while allowing CO2 to pass through. The treated gas is routed to a thermal oxidizer (incinerator) before discharge to atmosphere.
Tail Gas Treating Technology Comparison
| Technology | Recovery (%) | Complexity | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCOT | 99.8–99.9 | High | High |
| Beavon-Stretford | 99.5–99.8 | Moderate | Moderate |
| SUPERCLAUS | 99.0–99.5 | Low | Low |
| CBA (Cold Bed Adsorption) | 99.0–99.3 | Low | Low |
The SCOT process remains the industry standard for facilities that must meet stringent environmental regulations requiring ≥99.9% sulfur recovery or ≤250 ppmv SO2 in stack emissions. Its high capital cost is justified at larger plants (typically >50 long tons per day of sulfur production) where regulatory compliance demands the highest recovery efficiency.
2. Hydrogenation Reactor
The hydrogenation reactor is the heart of the SCOT process. Its function is to convert all sulfur compounds remaining in the Claus tail gas into a single species—hydrogen sulfide—so that selective amine absorption can achieve efficient removal.
Reducing Gas Generator
Upstream of the reactor, an inline burner operates under substoichiometric (fuel-rich) conditions to produce a gas stream containing 2–5 vol% H2 and 1–3 vol% CO. This reducing gas provides the hydrogen and carbon monoxide needed for the catalytic hydrogenation and hydrolysis reactions. The burner typically fires natural gas or fuel gas with approximately 60–70% of the theoretical air requirement.
Key Reactions
The following reactions occur over the catalyst bed:
Additionally, elemental sulfur vapor reacts with hydrogen:
Catalyst Types
The most common catalyst is cobalt-molybdenum on alumina support (CoMo/Al2O3), which provides excellent activity for both hydrogenation and hydrolysis at operating temperatures. Titania-based catalysts are sometimes used as an alternative, particularly when higher COS conversion is required.
- CoMo/Al2O3: Industry standard; good activity for SO2, COS, and CS2 conversion; typical bed life of 3–5 years
- Titania (TiO2): Higher COS hydrolysis activity; used in some specialized applications; more expensive
Operating Conditions
| Parameter | Typical Range | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Reactor inlet temperature | 500–650°F | Must exceed sulfur dewpoint |
| Gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) | 1,000–3,000 hr−1 | Based on actual volumetric flow |
| H2/CO ratio at inlet | >2:1 | Ensures complete hydrogenation |
| H2 concentration | 2–5 vol% | Excess H2 drives equilibrium |
| Pressure drop across bed | 1–3 psi | Monitor for catalyst degradation |
Conversion Efficiency
Under proper operating conditions with fresh catalyst, the hydrogenation reactor achieves the following conversion rates:
- SO2 conversion: >99.9%
- COS conversion: >99.5%
- CS2 conversion: >99%
- Elemental sulfur conversion: >99.9%
It is critical to maintain the H2/CO ratio above 2:1 at the reactor inlet. Insufficient hydrogen leads to incomplete SO2 conversion, causing sulfur species to break through to the amine absorber. Operators should monitor the reactor outlet for SO2 breakthrough as an early indicator of catalyst deactivation or inadequate reducing gas supply.
3. Quench and Cooling
After the hydrogenation reactor, the gas stream exits at approximately 550–650°F and must be cooled to 100–130°F before entering the amine absorber. The cooling system also condenses and removes the large quantity of water vapor generated in the reactor.
Cooling Approaches
Two primary cooling configurations are used in SCOT units:
Waste Heat Boiler: The hot reactor effluent passes through a shell-and-tube waste heat boiler that generates low-pressure steam (typically 50–150 psig). This approach recovers thermal energy and improves the overall plant energy efficiency. The gas is cooled to approximately 300–350°F in the waste heat boiler, then further cooled in a downstream quench tower or trim cooler.
Direct Contact Quench Tower: The hot gas is cooled by direct contact with circulating water in a packed or trayed column. Water is continuously circulated through an external cooler (air-cooled or water-cooled). This approach is simpler and less expensive but does not recover energy as steam.
Design Considerations
- Water condensation: The Claus tail gas contains significant water vapor (typically 30–35 vol%), and additional water is produced by the hydrogenation reactions. Most of this moisture condenses during cooling and must be removed before the amine absorber.
- Sulfur dewpoint: Upstream of the reactor, the gas temperature must be maintained above the sulfur dewpoint (approximately 250–300°F depending on sulfur vapor concentration) to prevent liquid sulfur from condensing on the catalyst and deactivating it.
- Sour water management: The condensed water contains dissolved H2S and must be routed to a sour water stripper for treatment before disposal or reuse.
- Acid gas knock-out drum: A separator vessel downstream of the quench section removes entrained liquid droplets from the gas before it enters the amine absorber. Proper mist elimination is essential to prevent amine foaming and degradation.
Quench System Performance
| Parameter | Waste Heat Boiler Route | Direct Quench Route |
|---|---|---|
| Inlet temperature | 550–650°F | 550–650°F |
| Outlet temperature | 100–130°F | 100–130°F |
| Steam generation | 50–150 psig LP steam | None |
| Capital cost | Higher | Lower |
| Energy recovery | Yes | No |
| Maintenance | Tube corrosion monitoring | Circulating water treatment |
4. Amine Absorber Design
The amine absorber is the final treatment step in the SCOT process. It selectively removes H2S from the cooled tail gas using a chemical solvent, producing a treated gas clean enough for discharge to the thermal oxidizer.
Selective Absorption with MDEA
Methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) is the preferred solvent for SCOT absorbers because of its high selectivity for H2S over CO2. This selectivity is critical: the Claus tail gas contains substantial CO2 (typically 20–30 vol%), and if the amine co-absorbs CO2, the recycled acid gas to the Claus unit becomes diluted with CO2, reducing Claus burner temperature and sulfur recovery efficiency.
MDEA achieves selectivity because H2S reacts with the amine via a fast proton-transfer mechanism, while CO2 absorption requires a slower carbamate formation reaction. By limiting the contact time (using fewer trays or shorter packing height), CO2 absorption is minimized while H2S removal remains high.
Design Parameters
- Number of trays: 15–25 (valve or sieve trays); packed columns use 15–25 ft of structured packing
- Lean amine loading: 0.005–0.015 mol H2S per mol amine (very lean for tail gas service)
- Rich amine loading: Varies with gas composition; typically 0.10–0.25 mol/mol
- Amine concentration: 40–50 wt% MDEA in water
- Operating pressure: Near atmospheric (0–5 psig); low pressure limits absorption driving force
Amine Circulation Rate
The required amine circulation rate is determined by the H2S mass balance:
Where ΔLoading is the difference between rich and lean amine loadings, and the solution density and molecular weight are determined by the amine concentration.
Amine Performance Comparison
| Amine | H2S Selectivity | Typical Loading (mol/mol) | Max Loading (mol/mol) |
|---|---|---|---|
| MDEA | High | 0.10 | 0.45 |
| DEA | Moderate | 0.05 | 0.35 |
| DGA | Low | 0.05 | 0.35 |
The rich amine from the SCOT absorber is typically regenerated in the main amine regeneration system shared with the upstream acid gas removal unit (AGRU). The regenerated acid gas is recycled to the Claus SRU front end, completing the sulfur recovery loop.
5. Environmental Compliance
The primary driver for installing a SCOT tail gas treating unit is to meet increasingly stringent environmental regulations governing sulfur dioxide emissions from sulfur recovery operations. After the SCOT absorber, the treated tail gas is routed to a thermal oxidizer (incinerator) that converts any remaining H2S to SO2 before discharge to atmosphere through a stack.
Regulatory Requirements
| Regulation | Requirement |
|---|---|
| EPA NSPS Subpart Ja | ≥99.9% recovery or ≤250 ppmv SO2 |
| EPA NSPS Subpart J | ≥99.8% recovery (>20 LT/D plants) |
| World Bank IFC | ≤150 ppmv SO2 |
| Alberta ERCB (Canada) | ≤10 t/d SO2 equivalent |
Stack Emissions and Thermal Oxidizer
The treated gas leaving the SCOT absorber typically contains 10–100 ppmv H2S. This gas is routed to a thermal oxidizer (incinerator) operating at 1,200–1,400°F, where all remaining H2S is oxidized to SO2. The resulting stack gas SO2 concentration is typically 100–250 ppmv, well within regulatory limits when the SCOT unit is operating properly.
The thermal oxidizer also destroys any residual COS, CS2, and mercaptans, converting them to SO2 and CO2. Proper combustion chamber design ensures complete oxidation with a minimum residence time of 0.5–1.0 seconds at temperature.
Continuous Emissions Monitoring (CEMS)
Regulatory agencies require continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS) on the thermal oxidizer stack to verify ongoing compliance. Key monitored parameters include:
- SO2 concentration: Primary compliance parameter; measured by UV fluorescence or pulsed fluorescence analyzers
- Stack gas flow rate: Used to calculate total mass emissions (lb/hr or tonnes/day)
- O2 concentration: Ensures proper incinerator operation and verifies excess air
- Stack temperature: Confirms adequate combustion temperature for complete oxidation
Facilities are also required to report total sulfur recovery efficiency on a rolling average basis (typically 12-hour or 24-hour rolling average). Exceedances must be reported to regulatory agencies and may trigger enforcement actions. Proper SCOT unit operation, including maintaining adequate reducing gas supply, catalyst activity, and amine circulation, is essential for sustained environmental compliance.
References
- GPSA, Chapter 22 — Sulfur Recovery
- API Publication 955 — Sulfur Recovery Operations
- EPA 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ja — Standards of Performance for Sulfur Recovery Units
- Shell Claus Off-gas Treating (SCOT) Process Technical Manual
Ready to apply these concepts?
→ Browse Related Calculators