⚙️

Turboexpander Efficiency Calculator

GPSA · API 617 · Lee-Kesler · Cryogenic NGL Recovery

Advertisement
Turboexpander Isentropic Efficiency
Calculate performance metrics for radial inflow turboexpanders. Choose between ideal gas (temperature-based) or real gas (enthalpy-based) methods.
Calculation Method:
📐 Ideal Gas Method
ηs = (T1 T2,act) / (T1 T2,isen)
Fast calculation assuming Z=1. May show >100% efficiency at high pressure due to Joule-Thomson effects.

Inlet Conditions

psia
°F
MMSCFD

Outlet Conditions

psia
°F

Gas Properties

lb/lbmol
Gas TypekMWSG
Lean NG1.27–1.3017–190.59–0.66
Rich NG1.20–1.2519–240.66–0.83
Methane1.3116.040.554
Ethane1.1930.071.038

📚 Learn the Theory

Understand turboexpander efficiency principles, calculations, and industry applications

Read Engineering Guide →

📊 Performance Benchmarks

EfficiencyAssessment
>88%Exceptional
80–88%Normal range
70–80%Below optimal
<70%Requires attention

Per API 617 and OEM specifications for radial inflow expanders

🔧 Troubleshooting Low Efficiency

  • Bearings: Check oil condition, temperature, vibration
  • Seals: Inspect for leakage, verify buffer gas
  • Rotor: Look for fouling, erosion, imbalance
  • Inlet: Verify no liquid carryover, clean strainer
  • Speed: Confirm operating at design RPM
  • Turndown: Check position vs. design point

📐 Design Guidelines

ParameterTypical Range
Expansion Ratio2:1 – 5:1 (single stage)
Tip Speed800–1200 ft/s
Specific Speed60–90 (optimal)
Power Range100 kW – 25 MW

🔬 When to Use Each Method

ConditionRecommended Method
P < 300 psia, lean gasIdeal Gas ✓
P > 400 psiaReal Gas
Rich gas (MW > 22)Real Gas
Cryogenic (<-100°F outlet)Real Gas
Efficiency shows >100%Real Gas
Quick estimateIdeal Gas ✓

💡 Understanding Efficiency

Why Efficiency Can Exceed 100%

The ideal gas method assumes Z=1. At high pressure (>400 psia), real gases experience additional Joule-Thomson cooling beyond isentropic predictions. This isn't an error—it indicates real gas effects. Switch to the Real Gas method for accurate results.

Visual Explanation

ScenarioWhat's Happening
η = 85%Actual temp is warmer than isentropic (normal losses)
η = 100%Actual temp equals isentropic (perfect, theoretical)
η > 100%Actual temp is colder than isentropic prediction

Expander vs Compressor Definition

Expanders: η = (actual work out) / (ideal work out) — higher is better
Compressors: η = (ideal work in) / (actual work in) — inverted ratio

Typical Efficiency by Application

NGL/LPG Recovery80–88%
LNG Processing85–88%
Fuel Gas Letdown75–82%

What Affects Efficiency

✓ Helps: Clean gas, design-point operation, good bearings/seals, proper speed
✗ Hurts: Fouling, erosion, liquid ingestion, off-design turndown, worn seals

📚 References

  • GPSA Engineering Data Book, 14th Ed., Ch. 13
  • API 617: Centrifugal Compressors & Expanders
  • Lee, B.I. & Kesler, M.G., AIChE J., 21(3), 1975
  • Campbell, Gas Conditioning & Processing, Vol. 2
  • Bloch & Soares, Turboexpanders and Process Applications
Advertisement
Advertisement